Better
Material for food handling and Processing
-
Worries in human health have become important in developing
countries, for this reason the food purity in handling
and processing has been made increasingly stringent.
It is world wide recognized that Stainless Steel is
the material of construction for plant equipment in
the food processing industry to achieve sanitation
and corrosion resistance. With these basis it becomes
necessary to establish a market development program
for these countries that consider all the great variety
of problems in the food industry and hope that stainless
steel satisfy them.
Introduction:
There are two main concepts responsible for food fitness
for human consumption.
Sanitation - Bacteriological contamination
during handling, production, processing and serving.
Contamination - Foodstuff, like other
chemical substance is responsible in all phases of
processing for corrosive effects. These effects are
in addition influenced by environmental condition
of processing, that is, by the temperatures involved,
by the rates of flow and by stresses in component
parts of process machinery. The corrosive effects
will result in harmful substances include in foodstuffs.
Material Selection:
When the technicians face the question what material
will be satisfactory for the fabrication of the equipment
they want a material which will most nearly fulfil
all the requirements. The questions have been generalized
and are listed in the following order of importance
as we see them.
Which material does not contaminate the product?
This is a general requirement that should be broken
down into branches related among themselves. First,
the direct or chemical contamination by metals or
metallic ions.
The Nickel Development Institute developed an interesting
study about nickel pick up in pots made in stainless
steel The food samples were selected to obtain their
acidity and chloride content, representing a typical
pickling medil (lemon, marmalade, green tomato, chutney,
potatoes, rhubarb and apricots). There used twelve
new pots from fc different manufacturers. All pots
were stainless steel.
The level of nickel pick up on cooling with the most
aggressive food "rhubarb" mean. 10- .15
pg. This amount smaller than the normal daily intake
by human of 150-200 pg of nickel per day even more
the facts show that the is no evidence about people
will be sensitized by nickel ingested in food.
A second study, developed by Acerinax, S. A. about
metal transfer into food under acidic conditions,
in which were test Stainless steel AISI 403, stainless
steel AISI 304, commercial aluminum and carbon steel
and the medium was 2 Acetic acid by weight at 40C
in contact for 10,20 and 30 days. The results are
summarized as below.
Time
Fe Cr Al Ni
Stainless 304 10 Days 4.2 022 0.19 < 0.12
20 Days 2.7 0.22 0.19 < 0.12
30 Days 2.3 0.28 0.19 < 0.12
Stainless 130 10 Days 7.3 0.4 0.19 < 0.12
20 Days 8.6 0.71 0.19 < 0.12
30 Days 6.6 0.87 0.19 < 0.12
Aluminum 10 Days 18.2 3.41 5,300 < 0.12
20 Days 17.9 5.58 7,160 < 0.12
30 Days 31.3 12.4 15,350 0.22
Carbon steel 10 Days 57,770 7.44 26.7 < 0.12
20 Days 62,990 6.82 25.0 < 0.12
30 Days 112,000 14 39.9 < 0.12
Metal
Pick up at 400C under 3% Acetic Acid (pg/cm2)
We also know that the high ductility, tensile strength
and wear resistance of the stainless steel prevent
the possibility of mechanical contamination. Second,
The indirect, bacteriological or biological contamination
resulting from the material selected.
The best we can do on this matter is the design
for the "Clean up" process. The fabrication
of equipment will meet the most exact requirements
for the easy maintenance and cleaning.
Which material is easy to clean?
The surface finish of material should be smooth,
free of pits or scratches and present minimum opportunity
for the adhesion of food particles or bacteria.
Food technologists and fabricators concerned with
the prevention of bacteriological contamination
developed this "Sanitary finish" produced
by grinding with 480 mesh abrasive and then butting
to remove grind lines. The finish highly polished
on all surface which came in contact with the food
product give a thorough cleaning an disinfecting
surface.
The Nickel Development Institute developed an interesting
research on bacterial cleanability. Using the latest
technology to quantify bacterial contamination the
research compares stainless steel with polycarbonate
plastic and mineral-resistant enameled steel.
Under standardized condition, specimens were contaminated
with acinetobacter calcoaceti, a bacterium associated
with foods spoilage. After a period of bacterial
inculcation they were spray washed tor up to 40
seconds with water with domestic detergent. The
bacteria remaining were stained and viewed under
a microscope with UV source.
When specimens were tested in spray washed conditions,
all showed a similar level of the retained bacteria
then, specimens had been subjected to controlled
rubbing with a 40 grit abrasive cloth showed significant
difference Stainless steel retained 10 times lower
bacteria than the other materials.
Latest works on this matter have shown that addition
of wiping action to the washing treatment enhances
the bacterial cleanability of stainless steel as
illustrated as below.
Which material does not corrode in operation conditions?
The driving force of the corrosive reaction between
metal and environment is electrochemical. The resultant
electrochemical potential varies with the corroding
media and the metal and determines the tendency
of the reaction. The protective oxide film formed
in stainless steel is very thin, almost of molecular
thickness, invisible and it is formed instantaneously
when exposed to oxidizing condition. This film can
be destroyed by reducing conditions such as those
present in halogen acid solutions, fortunately,
we seldom encounter these conditions in the food
industry. This is substantiated by literally thousands
of laboratories.
Which material has the proper physical properties?
Stainless steel has high tensile strength and yield
point and relatively high hardness, withstands the
mechanical attacking of high-pressure water, scouring,
brushing and abusive handling. For any material
of equipment construction, this strength - weight
ratio is most important. We can consider the yield
point as a measurement of strength.
Interpretation to the above table can be summarized
as below: Stainless steel has a higher strength
- weight ratio than any of the other materials used
for food processing equipment. We can consider hardness
as a measure that indicates the resistance to abrasive
wear. If we combine hardness with Strength - weight
ratio, it indicates that stainless steel is having
an excellent resistance to both abrasion and mechanical
deformation.
Which material has the low maintenance cost?
When specifiers analyzed initial cost they should
consider the best life span costing of stainless
steel.
It does not require protective coating. Very little
weight reduction. Wide time interval between maintenance
/ replacement. It does not present for a short time
of loss of production for maintenance replacement
event.
Even more, when we consider the superior characteristics
of stainless steel in this applications. Food technologist
know the cost of one production day ruined by metal
iron contamination.
Which material is available in required
forms?
Stainless steels are produced in practically every
form required, include wrought or cast pieces, hot
and cold rolled plate, bar and wire, seamless and
welded tube, fittings, welding electrodes, fasteners,
etc.; also are available in different chemical compositions
and with different surface finishing.
Which material has an attractive "hygienic
appearance" ?
The public in general and the housewives in specific
associate stainless steel with culinary cleanliness.
Many companies want to show to the public the cleanability
of the stainless steel equipment.
This hygienic appearance has a psychological effect
on consumers, inspectors and plant personal.
All these above discussion accentuates the utility
of Stainless steel over other conventional materials
in food handling and processing industry.
|
|